By Kevin O’Neill
BCS BUREAUCRATS MAIN GOAL: AVOID REAL
WORLD
By Kevin O’Neill
Doesn’t it seem more and more like the BCS is brought
to you by a bunch of people who don’t want to have to
get a job in the real world? They like their cushy little
fiefdoms where they really aren’t accountable for much
of anything. They get sideline passes, have a bunch of TV
people sucking up to them, etc. While this is overstated,
the entrenched bureaucracy of college athletics is something
that is rarely examined.
Almost all that can possibly be said about the BCS controversy
has been said. Everyone seems to come out smelling like a
rose (no Rose Bowl pun intended), however. Southern Cal has
a sweet scenario. They play on their home field for a share
of the title. Despite Michigan’s impressive finish to
the season, it is obviously an easier task for the Trojans
to beat the Maize and Blue at home than it is to play in front
of 65,000 crazed Cajuns and 15,000 others in New Orleans.
LSU lucks out by getting a suddenly vulnerable opponent, while
Oklahoma’s good fortune is just being in the mix at
all. Reminds me of the “New Coke” fiasco. What
was originally seen as a debacle ended up being a story for
weeks about how many people just loved Coca-Cola just the
way it is. There would have been no way to buy the positive
publicity for the original product that Coke received at no
cost as a result of their “New Coke” move. The
media got a great story and the participants all benefited.
Sounds like the BCS experience doesn’t it?
Who’s had the roughest year in sports? How about Mike
Tranghese? Commissioner of the Big East in his permanent job
and this year serving as he is serving, of all things, as
Chairman of the BCS. His entire year ruined by the sleazy
athletic administrators of the ACC and a bunch of computers.
Final thought (for this week anyhow) on the BCS deal. Having
computers makes sense, but there is a big, big difference
between the quality of a Massey or a Sagarin, two guys who
know sports and work really hard, and the joke that is the
New York Times computer ratings. There’s a good chance
that the Times’ rankings has a lot of culpability in
this mess.
Some bizarre strategic decisions this past Sunday in the
NFL went unchallenged by TV crews. Down 10-0 in snowy Foxboro,
Dave Wannsteadt goes for it on 4th and 8 from his own 3-yard
line with 1:18 left in the game. Why not? At least he’s
not giving up. If something freaky happens to get a TD you
can then onside kick and have a chance to win. Instead, Fiedler
is sacked for the safety to make it 12-0 Patriots. On the
free kick the Dolphins just punt away and the Pats make the
fair catch. One Brady knee, two Brady knee, and the Pats run
the clock out. Our question, if you’re going to go for
it on 4th and 8 from your own 3 down 10-0, why not onside
kick the free kick down 12-0? There was no down side. If you’re
unsuccessful the Pats just take a couple of knees anyhow.
Obviously, even if you’re successful on the onside kick,
the chances of winning are still about 1 in 500, but why the
change in direction?
Shift to Green Bay. 9½ minutes left in the game. Packers
have come back from a 14-0 deficit to lead 19-14. The Bears
are driving to possibly take a lead and Kordell Stewart throws
an interception that is returned 90 yards for a TD. Green
Bay is now up 25-14 with the extra point pending. Mike Sherman
inexplicably sends out his offense to go for two. No real
reason to do this. The 98% certain kick gives you a 12-point
lead, the 40% 2-pointer gives you a 13-point lead. No real
difference between the two margins. At 12 or 13 Chicago needs
two TD’s to beat you. But the important thing is to
get off 11. 11 allows the Bears to tie it up with an 8-point
TD and a field goal. Not expecting to have to play defense,
the Bears call time out. You figure during the time out someone
would tell Sherman, “hey Mike, let’s just kick
it and get over 11. It’s the obvious thing to do.”
Nope. They still go for two. The Packers converted the two-pointer
but it was clearly the wrong move to make. There isn’t
even an argument for going for two there. Just like in the
New England game, the subject was not broached by play-by-play
team.
Longtime readers who are bored with this subject, move to
the next paragraph, please. But why these multi-million dollar
businesses don’t spend $100,000 for a “strategy
and clock management” coach continues to baffle us.
Every week there are wrong moves made by coaches who are too
preoccupied with play calling and matchups to make the proper
game management decisions. While it is easy to criticize these
missteps from the comfort of our living room, we certainly
understand how coaches can make mistakes in the heat of battle.
What we don’t understand is why they don’t take
steps to insure that they make the right moves.
Central Florida had a terribly disappointing season after
being picked by some as a front-runner in the MAC. In addition
to a disappointing on-field performance, one of the reasons
coach Mike Kruczek was fired was due to a series of suspensions
that decimated his team. A number of players, including big
time QB Ryan Schneider, were suspended for falsifying academic
attendance records. So isn’t it rather ironic that Central
Florida’s new $750,000-per year head coach is George
O’Leary? O’Leary was fired by Notre Dame after
five days on the job for….falsifying academic attendance
records.
Former Missouri basketball player Ricky Clemons is the frontrunner
for this season’s Tony Cole Award. The news this week
that Clemons made jailhouse claims that he was paid by Missouri
coaches is no surprise to anyone who has followed to Missouri
hoops since Quin Snyder took over. So explain this fawning
column by Seattle Times columnist Steve Kelley entitled Snyder
a Rare Shining Star in Sullied World of Coaching. Check it
out at http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/stevekelley/2001811577_kelley10.html.
Kelley, who apparently just hasn’t been paying attention,
makes Snyder out to be Father Flanagan when in reality he’s
a combination of Jim Harrick and Jerry Tarkanian. You would
think a columnist who had a chance to watch Rick Neuheisel
up close would know better.
Last week Hornets coach Tim Floyd returned to Chicago, where
he had a 49-190 mark coaching the Bulls. He reminded the Chicago
media that the plan was for the Bulls to lose so they could
gather high draft picks and build with talented young players.
Floyd compared it to people forgetting why the US invaded
Afghanistan. Interesting comparison to say the least. On to
people who operate with a tad more humility. Earlier this
year a priest from my church who was moving on to another
assignment gave a farewell sermon. He barely even referred
to himself and instead told parishioners that if they are
ever tempted to think of him, think of Jesus instead. He concluded,
“The one thing you can do for me, is to just follow
Him.” I was impressed with his concern for the spiritual
lives of his flock overwhelming any interest he had in receiving
kudos for the fine work he had done. So how in the world are
we going to equate this to the Daily Racing Form? Go here
http://www.drf.com/drfNewsArticle.do?NID=51943&subs=0&arc=0
and read this farewell column from Joe Hirsch, a columnist
with DRF since the John Quincy Adams administration. Instead
of listing his accomplishments, Hirsch chronicles what he
loves about horses and racing. The result is a touching and
admirable column.
Seeing Michael Vick back reminded viewers of how he just
doesn’t like to get hit. He’s complained about
teams trying to injure him previously and when a Panther lineman
lunged at the scrambling Vick and was lucky enough to hit
him, albeit a little bit high, Vick carried on as though it
was premeditated. It wasn’t a planned cheap shot, the
guy just got lucky to take him down. If Vick stays reasonably
healthy he will soon have a well-earned reputation as a prima
donna who doesn’t like contact. In other Falcons news
(isn’t this exciting?) Dan Reeves deserved to get fired,
and deserved to get fired a couple of years ago. In his seven
seasons with the Falcons there were only two winning campaigns,
and his teams were known for not putting up a fight down the
stretch once they had fallen out of the playoff hunt. Amazingly,
in more than 35 years of play the Falcons have never had consecutive
winning seasons.
We’ve got daily hoops selections and information for
you at no cost on our hotline at 1-770-618-8700. The Hotline
is a 24-hour voice broadcast and doesn’t cost you a
thing. Let’s look at a NFL game for this Sunday. With
a lack of production out of the quarterback position and a
solid defense, the Bills have gone under the total in ten
consecutive games. Tennessee may let down off of their disappointing
home loss to the Colts and their offense has slowed a bit
in recent weeks. What keeps this from being a stronger play
is the fact that this total opened at 40 and the Titans have
had only one game all year go under 38 points. The home team
often controls the pace, but if Tennessee is flat this non-divisional
matchup may be an atypical game for them. Look to the under
at Bankruptcy Coliseum this Sunday.
Our appearances on the web may be somewhat sporadic over
the Christmas holidays. Make sure you don’t miss an
single edition of S&G News by signing up for your no-cost
subscription at http://www.consumerbet.com/email.html.
You’ll get S&G News delivered via email each week.
Kevin O’Neill is the director of content for www.consumerbet.com.
His 24-hour free telephone selection hotline can be accessed
by calling 1-770-618-8700.
Take advantage
of the ConsumerBet Best Deal Guarantee at the Industry's Best
Sports Books
| Previous Issues of Sports and Gaming
News |
| |
|